Answer:

?

The filibuster is a tactic used by the Senate to prevent a vote on proposed legislation, and has been used throughout American history. But how does the current usage of the filibuster compare to how it was used in the past? Let’s take a look.

The filibuster in the current Senate

According to the Pew Research Center, the Senate has managed to overcome the 60-vote hurdle to avoid a filibuster on several of its main legislative achievements. It has been difficult for the evenly divided Senate to reach a filibuster-proof 60-vote majority, but it has managed to do so, proving that the filibuster is still a major factor.

The impact of the filibuster

According to American Progress, the filibuster has long been used as a method to delay or prevent action on Senate legislation. Though the filibuster has long been a tactic used by the Senate, it has become increasingly common in recent years. This has had a significant impact on federal policymaking, often causing delays or the abandonment of important legislation.

The history of the filibuster

As The Washington Post reports, the filibuster has become more common even as it’s become easier to break. The graph shows that the use of the filibuster has been steadily increasing since the early 20th century. Meanwhile, the time it takes to overcome a filibuster has become shorter. This demonstrates that the filibuster is still being used frequently, but that it has become easier to break.

Conclusion

The filibuster is an important feature of the Senate, and its recent use has been compared to its use in past decades. The current evenly divided Senate has managed to break past the 60-vote hurdle in some cases, but the filibuster has still had a significant impact on federal policymaking. The evidence suggests that the use of the filibuster has been growing, and that it has become easier to break in recent times, demonstrating that it is still a powerful tool.