?
The Overall Performance section of a military Officer Evaluation Report (OER) is a critical part of a senior military officer’s career. In this section, the senior rater is tasked with writing an appraisal of the rated officer’s performance that reflects the senior rater’s experience, training, and expertise. The OER is an important part of a military officer’s development and is used to assess a senior officer’s suitability for promotion or other career opportunities. As such, the senior rater must ensure that their entries are appropriate and accurately depict the rated officer’s performance.
When writing a senior rater entry for the Overall Performance section of the OER, there are certain criteria that should be met. These criteria include accuracy, objectivity, and professionalism. The senior rating should accurately reflect the rated officer’s job performance, abilities, and accomplishments. The senior rating should also be objective and free from any type of personal bias. Additionally, the senior rating should be professional and free from any form of disruptions, such as inflammatory language or a lack of understanding.
In addition to the criteria mentioned, the senior rater should also consider the format and content of their entry. The senior rater should provide an organized and well-written evaluation of the rated officer’s performance. The entry should clearly describe the rated officer’s job performance, accomplishments, and any potential areas of improvement. The senior rating should address each of the OER’s sections, including performance bullets, grades, and written comments. The entries should be concise and not exceed the OER’s allotted word count.
When writing senior rater entries for the Overall Performance section of the OER, it is important to consider the criteria and format outlined above. Doing so ensures that the senior rating is accurate, objective, and professional. Additionally, by being mindful of the format and content of the entry, the senior rater can ensure that their evaluation accurately reflects the rated officer’s job performance and areas of improvement. By following these guidelines, the senior rater can ensure that the OER is an accurate reflection of the rated officer’s performance and abilities.